Recent comments

Displaying comments since Mon Mar 25 04:24:32 2024 UTC. Past month · Past week · Past day

2024-04-12 10:20:31 GMT by Me [he] on Numeral systems/Number representations [view in context]
OK, please add Lucas numbers.
2024-04-12 11:12:41 GMT by Me [he] on Numeral systems/Number representations [view in context]
I know this looks like spam, but please add:

Fibonacci {option: Starting numbers: _number_, _number_; presets: Fibonacci {1, 2}, Lucas {2, 1}} [The starting numbers (values of last 2 digits).]
Factors {option: Recursive: _checkbox_} [If it is recursive, the exponents are displayed in Factors notation.]
Transfinite ordinals {option: ω=: _number_} [Defines ω (the first transfinite ordinal) as a number, and then works upwards from there. ε_0 is defined to be ω^^ω (a power tower of ω ω's).]
Roman {option: Custom: _checkbox{yes @ Custom numbers: _list⁄_number_ = _text_⁄_, Allow subtraction rules: _checkbox_}_} [If custom numbers are turned on, you can set any number to any string, and toggle subtraction rules.]
2024-04-12 14:41:50 GMT by Kets [God] on A Text Game [view in context]
What an I suppose to dooooo you can use north west and east but you cant use south because “U” doesn’t exist.. PLS HELPPPPPPP
2024-04-12 14:43:05 GMT by Kets [God] on A Text Game [view in context]
What do i dooooo i know you can use north east and west but you cant use south because you cant use “U” im so confused  :/
2024-04-12 16:52:13 GMT by chridd [she] on A Text Game [view in context]
It's possible to abbreviate directions, so "s" will work; however, going "s" isn't necessary.
2024-04-12 17:07:13 GMT by chridd [she] on Numeral systems/Number representations [view in context]
Transfinite ordinals aren't a representation of the real numbers, so they wouldn't make sense for this page (there isn't really a way to show them in different bases etc.).  However, I do have an ordinal number calculator: https://chridd.nfshost.com/calc/number-types#ord.  It doesn't support ε₀ yet, I think because I couldn't figure something out.

I can't find information about that particular generalization of Fibonacci coding; I'll have to think more about whether that can work.  (I know about the Lucas numbers, the question is whether/how they'd specifically work with Fibonacci coding.)
2024-04-17 19:08:41 GMT by Me [he] on Number types [view in context]
Please at least accept ε₀ 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
2024-04-17 21:15:50 GMT by Me [he] on Number types [view in context]
Also, what does the set theory say about ג_n?
2024-04-17 21:37:00 GMT by Me [he] on Number types [view in context]
Make a button to solve the polynomial = 0. I know this looks like spam but please forgive me <:(
2024-04-19 19:53:42 GMT by Me [he] on Number types [view in context]
Also why is 0.1+0.2=0.3000000000000000000004 even in real numbers?
2024-04-19 22:06:36 GMT by chridd [she] on Number types [view in context]
Just making sure this is clear: I don't actually guarantee any new features for this.  This is just something I'm doing in my spare time (and sometimes I have other stuff I want to do), and also I'm not an expert on the stuff here; I'm only going to work on this if I'm sufficiently interested, have time, etc.  I don't have an issue with suggesting features, as long as you understand that I don't have an obligation to add them.

ε₀: It's been a while since I worked on the ordinal numbers part, but from what I can remember, I had trouble finding information about how exactly to do what I'm trying to do here (take an arbitrary expression and simplify it to some canonical form); like, the definitions weren't worded in a way that makes this easy, and there were examples, but not enough to cover all the cases.  I figured out enough to be confident about expressions involving ω, but not enough to be confident about expressions involving ε₀.  (I could look at it again at some point, but again, I don't guarantee anything.)

ג_n: Gimel?  I'm not familiar with that notation.

real number imprecision: because computers can't actually perform exact calculations on real numbers.  I included "real numbers" mostly for completeness, but everything involving real numbers is still doing calculations using floating point numbers.  I did start a rewrite that would give more exact answers *sometimes*, but I never got around to finishing it.

Check for new comments